You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Healthcare for all’ tag.

mandala celticI am confused.  My understanding of bodyworkers in California getting state certified was so we wouldn’t have to pay every city or county we worked in!  How many other jobs ask that of their employees?  Does that mean I need to pay a business license fee (about $75 in Murrieta) if I work in Wildomar, Lake Elsinore, Escondido, Fallbrook, Menifee and Moreno Valley?  As it is many of us are getting paid less than we received when we started.  (In 1982 when I began doing massage therapy professionally, I would not accept work that paid me less than $30 an hour. ) And sadly, places like Massage Envy came into the area advertising $39 massages.  The public response is of course to expect that from any bodyworker.  I would be the first person to suggest people pay less money for healthcare and I hope we get a non-criminal health care system soon.   I hope massage therapy becomes covered by insurance, as it is all over the world.   This all feels wrong to me.  I will get back to you after I consult with the California bodywork certifying agency!


mandala "marina"As I was sorting through information about insurance coverage for massage therapy, and learning how few people can afford health insurance, I learned of a California bill that would ensure that all Californians have the needed prescription drugs, long-term care, and mental health services, amonng other health care.

One of the organizers for a local California chapter of Health Care for All said several years ago, “We are promoting SB840 as the solution to California’s skyrocketing health costs crisis. It will be better to pay a state ‘health tax’ than a private ‘health insurance premium.’ When we pay a premium to an insurance company a large portion of it, 20-30% goes to administration, shareholder dividends, executive reimbursements and marketing. Only 70-80% is spent on health care. And, when we pay a tax to a state health fund, 5% goes to administrative costs, and 95% goes to health care.”

Senator Sheila James Kuehl of the 23rd senatorial district (Los Angeles), the initial major legislative proponent of the bill says, “Today, health insurance and pharmaceutical companies and HMOs ration care and medications to those who can afford them. Under this bill care will be affordable for every Californian, and health system planning will be done by a public,
representative health policy board.

The Physicians for a National Health Program’s motto is:

From the San Francisco Bay Guardian, March 10th, 2009, by Tim Redmond

State Senator Mark Leno has taken on the long campaign to enact single-payer health reform in California. He’s announcing tomorrow (Wed 11th), meaning that he’s introduced SB 810, which follows (and is fairly identical to) SB840, the landmark measure by former senator Sheila Keuhl that passed the Legislature and was vetoed by the governor.

The bill is remarkable in its simple premise: Everyone–consumers, businesses, government — will save money if the public can take over the role of providing health care from the private insurance industry. “We don’t have a health-care policy now,” Leno told me. “We have a risk-management policy. When the private insurers talk about paying for health care, they call it a “medical loss.”

By Leno’s estimates — and those of about every other credible analyst and study — businesses could see lower costs, individuals could pay lower premiums and the state could spend less on health care if only the insurance industry came out of the picture.

“We pay more for health care than any other industrialized county, and we get worse outcomes,” he said. “The system is broken.”

But it won’t easy. Leno is confident that SB 810 will pass both houses of the Legislature and that the governnor will once again veto it. “And that’s why we need to make sure we elect a Democratic governor in 2010 who will promise to sign this bill in 2011,” he said. “And we need to start organizing now to defeat the referendum the insurance industry will put on the ballot in 2012 and the hundreds of millions of dollars they will spend to confuse Californians.”

In other words, it’s a long term battle. I wonder if any of these business groups like the California Chamber of Commerce will come to their senses and recognize that this is about the most pro-business thing you could do in this state. Health-care costs are slamming small businesses, hurting our ability to compete as a state and a nation — and the entire economy of California is more important than the profits of one industry.

We shall see.